Mr.Rebates

Mr. Rebates

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Study breaks down divorce rates by occupation

Sept 19, 2010

If you marry the charming dancer who asks for your hand, are you more likely to wind up in divorce court than if you'd picked the sensible engineer?

 That seems to be the suggestion of a recent study that explores the correlation of various occupations and rates of separation and divorce -- raising questions about the way our careers can impact our personal lives.
The study, published in the spring edition of the Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, was co-written by Michael Aamodt, a professor emeritus at Radford University who now works as a consultant with the Washington-based DCI Consulting Group.

At first, Aamodt wasn't interested in the romantic lives of either dancers or engineers. Much of his academic career has been spent researching the personalities of law enforcement officers. In previous studies Aamodt debunked a myth about higher-than-average suicide rates among police officers and showed that most cops have personality traits similar to those of other Americans.

Turning to their domestic lives, however, he found statistics about divorce rates based on occupation hard to come by. Student Shawn P. McCoy, co-author of the study, pressed Census officials to provide data that could be parsed to reveal divorce and separation rates for Americans working in 449 jobs.

At the time of the 2000 Census, 16.35 percent of Americans who had previously been married listed themselves as divorced or separated.
Only 14.5 percent of law enforcement officers who had been married said the same. (The rates varied widely across the profession, though: Just 12.5 percent of detectives were divorced, but 25.5 percent of fish and game wardens had broken up with a spouse.)
Dancers and choreographers registered the highest divorce rates (43.1 percent), followed by bartenders (38.4 percent) and massage therapists (38.2 percent). Also in the top 10 were casino workers, telephone operators, nurses and home health aides.
Three types of engineers -- agricultural, sales and nuclear engineers -- were represented among the 10 occupations with the lowest divorce rates. Also reporting low marital breakup rates were optometrists (4 percent), clergy (5.6 percent) and podiatrists (6.8 percent).
The numbers don't paint a complete picture. If a person had divorced and remarried by the time of the Census, they would be counted as married. So it could be the case that people in some occupations are just quicker to jump into the next marriage than others.
The authors also point out that the data don't reveal whether it's the nature of the jobs that lead to divorce, or if people prone to unstable relationships are drawn to certain professions.
Terri Orbuch, a sociologist and director of a long-term study on marriage funded by the National Institutes of Health, thinks that our working lives can directly affect our home lives.
"One of the things I found is that job stress spills over into our relationships. It can be not getting along with our colleagues or our boss . . . or the actual amount of time that we need to spend at work or doing work at home that spills over and affects our marriages negatively," says Orbuch, author of "5 Simple Steps to Take Your Marriage From Good to Great."
Aamodt knows his study raises more questions than it answers. Chief among them: Why?
"Why are bartenders this way and engineers that way? Unfortunately we just don't know," he says, before adding that several of his graduate students are looking into it.
But for now, perhaps this is reason enough to give that engineer a second glance.

Professions with highest and lowest divorce risk revealed

Sept 26, 2010

A recent study … explores the correlation of various occupations and rates of separation and divorce. … Dancers and choreographers registered the highest divorce rates (43.1 percent), followed by bartenders (38.4 percent) and massage therapists (38.2 percent). Also in the top 10 were casino workers, telephone operators, nurses and home health aides.  Three types of engineers — agricultural, sales and nuclear engineers — were represented among the 10 occupations with the lowest divorce rates. Also reporting low marital breakup rates were optometrists (4 percent), clergy (5.6 percent) and podiatrists (6.8 percent). (more) The study takes a simple regression predicting the “divorced” rate (% of once-married folks now divorced or separated) from income, age, gender, and race, and then for 500 different jobs collects a table of its actual divorce rate, the rate predicted by this regression, and the ratio between these two rates. (Yes these stats ignore remarried folks, but they still seem informative.)
Before you browse their divorce rate vs. job table to see what it says about your job, ask yourself: what do you infer about people who do a job associated with a low divorce rate?  Are you impressed and attracted by their reliability, or do you snicker that they are losers no one wants to tempt away from their marriage? How do you think most folks react?
OK, here the ten jobs with the highest relative divorce rates: massage therapists, bartenders, dancers and choreographers, health diagnosing and treating practitioners (all other), physicians and surgeons, gaming services workers, mathematicians, fish and game wardens, pile-driver operators, and first-line supervisor of gaming workers.
Here are the ten jobs with the lowest relative divorce rates: religious workers (all other), audiologists, first-line enlisted military supervisors/managers, shuttle car operators, optometrists, clergy, transit and railroad police, religious activities and education directors, agricultural engineers, and media and communication equipment workers (all other).
For comparison, here’s jobs ranked by their divorce rate:
1900divorcejobs

Marriage, divorce, and caste slurs

Sept 25, 2010

Caste is coming in the way of the divorce of a Delhi-based couple, both in their late 20s.
Sanjeev (name changed) and Rekha (name changed), both doctors in a government hospital, married in 2007 in New Delhi, against the wishes of their respective families. What followed, though, was quarelling and a string of complaints filed by the couple against each other.
The first complaint was filed by Rekha claiming that Sanjeev was torturing her, which was followed by another complaint of domestic violence, and then a case seeking maintenance.
It was only after Rekha had filed her various complaints that Sanjeev, who belongs to a schedule caste, complained to the police that during a quarrel, his wife had used derogatory words against his caste.
The trial court summoned Rekha and her parents under the SC/ST Act in July 2009, and the case is still pending along with all the other cases.

55,000 couples waiting for divorce in India

Should this surprise anyone this is how efficient the judiciary is in India, yet when it comes to charging innocent Men with Draconian laws like IPC 498a, and DV act 2005 the country is extremely efficient, this is all thanks to the legal Terrorists Feminazi Fascist Witches.  


June 24, 2010

The Centre for the first time has released the number of divorce cases pending in the country’s courts. Law and justice minister M Veerappa Moily put the figure at 55,000 on Wednesday.
He said the cases will be settled in a fortnight after Parliament amends the Hindu Marriage Act (HMA), 1955, and the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954, by including ‘irretrievable breakdown of marriage’ as grounds for divorce.
“We are also increasing the number of family courts to deal with the load of divorce cases in view of the proposed amendment. All divorce cases pending for more than three years will be first disposed of,” Moily said.
DNA was the first to report about the government’s plans to amend the HMA and the SMA following an interview with Moily last September.
Every year, an average 7,500 cases of divorce are filed in Mumbai, 9,000 in Delhi and 3,000 in Bangalore.
Moily had earlier said that the family courts will be given a target to wind up divorce and child custody cases within a year of their filing.
The Law Commission feels there is no use in keeping two persons in matrimony when they cannot live together peacefully. Also, a recent survey by a matrimonial portal found that young divorcees are keen to start afresh and as soon as possible.

(Video) The New SYMBOL and CURRENCY of MALE HATRED - MANDRIES.flv

New symbol of Male Hatred, explained. 

(Video) Live-In Relationship-Perspective of Indian Women- misuse ANTI-MALE Marital laws-P7 news

Part 1/2



Part 2/2

Attorney says 'sexting' Wis. prosecutor to resign

Here is a Public prosecutor the Feminazi's hate.

Sept 27, 2010

CHILTON, Wis. – A Wisconsin prosecutor facing removal from office over accusations that he used his position to seek relationships with women will resign instead, his attorney said Monday.
Attorney Robert Craanen said Calumet County District Attorney Ken Kratz will step down before Oct. 8, the date for a hearing on his possible removal from office.
Craanen spoke to reporters after a meeting at the Chilton courthouse on proceedings Gov. Jim Doyle initiated for Kratz's removal. Kratz was not present and did not immediately return a phone message left on his cell phone.
Kratz, a Republican, had been the top prosecutor in the eastern Wisconsin county south of Green Bay since 1992. He had faced demands for his resignation since earlier this month, when The Associated Press reported he sent text messages to a domestic abuse victim while he was prosecuting her ex-boyfriend on a strangulation charge.
In them, he called the woman a "hot nymph" and asked if she was "the kind of girl that likes secret contact with an older married elected DA."
Lawmakers, the governor and victims' advocates were outraged, and the news only got worse for Kratz.
An Oklahoma law student said she received similar texts in 2008 after Kratz supported her request for a pardon on an old drug charge. A woman complained to Doyle's office that Kratz invited her to a date at an autopsy. Other women who have stayed anonymous made similar allegations to a local newspaper and a civil rights attorney.
On Friday, the Office of Lawyer Regulation announced it would reopen an investigation into the allegations and determine whether Kratz committed professional misconduct. That office received biting criticism after news that it was aware of the text messages in March but declined to discipline Kratz, saying he hadn't violated any rules.
Kratz, 50, announced last week he was on medical leave from his $105,000 per year job indefinitely, and his attorney said he was getting treatment for an undisclosed problem. He has apologized for the text messages to Stephanie Van Groll, 26, but stayed mostly silent on the accusations by other women, except to deny the autopsy allegation.
Kratz was appointed by Gov. Tommy Thompson and had been re-elected several times since without opposition. He was not up for re-election until 2012.
Doyle last week started a rarely used process to consider removing Kratz from office for cause. The hearing Monday was to set a schedule for the process, including the public hearing date. Doyle ultimately would have made the call on whether the actions were serious enough to warrant removal.
Doyle spokesman Adam Collins said the governor has not received a resignation letter from Kratz, and until he does, "he will continue with the removal proceedings."
Kratz was best known for winning the 2007 conviction of Steven Avery in the death of a photographer. The case received national attention because the killing happened shortly after Avery was freed from prison, where he spent 18 years for a rape he did not commit.
Kratz was also the longtime chairman of the Wisconsin Crime Victims' Rights Board, which investigates and sanctions public officials who violate crime victims' rights. He stepped down from that post in December under pressure from state officials.

Monday, September 27, 2010

Married or no, women maintenance a must - Deserted long-term live-in partner entitled to support, says apex court

 Supreme court Justices are under the skirts of the Feminazi's, what kind of nonsense talk it this, read.
"At another point, the court criticised law-makers for enshrining Rs 500 as the maximum maintenance per month in a 1973 law. “Whoever fixed the amount was miserly,” the judges observed. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, enshrines this as the maximum maintenance for all dependants — wife and children."
 
1973 is not 2010, that is over 37 years back, these Judges are talking with a forked tongue, if the Supreme court today comes up with a figure do you think 40 years from now it will be adequate? Calling a the 500 Rupee figure of 37 years back miserly is petty talk, and not becoming of a Supreme Court Justices, these Judges have lowered themselves by such talk, they are no better then the average man on the street by such talk. Supreme court Judges are appeasing the sentiments of the Feminazi's Fascists Witches, societies blood suckers. 

Sept 25, 2010

The Supreme Court has said that any woman in a long-term live-in relationship is entitled to maintenance if deserted.
It is immaterial whether the woman was legally married to the man or not, the court said. What matters is whether she was completely dependent on him for sustenance.
“Women can’t be left vagrant. Right to life (guaranteed under the Constitution) includes the right to live with dignity. It is not possible to live with dignity when a woman has no food and leads the life of a destitute,” said Justice A.K. Ganguly, sitting with senior judge G.S. Singhvi.
Justice Singhvi added: “Someone has to take care of her if she is not able to, just to prevent vagrancy.”
“Leaving women to vagrancy threatens social stability and public order,” Justice Ganguly underlined. Women are, after all, the source of all power, he said.
The two judges were hearing the petition of a woman, Chunmuniya, who claimed that after her husband Ram Sharan died on March 7, 1992, she was “married” off to his younger brother Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha, as was the practice in her caste. Among some communities in northern India, the widow of an older brother is forced to live with any surviving brother. The marriage was performed simply by doing a katha, she said.
Virendra, who was 10 years younger than Ram Sharan, deserted her in 1996. She moved an application for maintenance on March 26, 1997, but he married another woman in 1998 while it was pending.
A family court upheld Chunmuniya’s plea for maintenance. But Virendra went to the high court denying that he had been married to her. He claimed she had fraudulently inserted her name as his wife in the family register with the panchayat to get a share of the property.
The high court ruled in his favour on November 11, 2007, saying Chunmuniya had not been able to prove marriage. Invocation before a sacred fire and saptapadi were the two ceremonies essential to the validity of a marriage, it said, setting aside the family court order. Chunmuniya then appealed to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court decided that the issue needed consideration and appointed Altaf Ahmad and P.S. Patwalia as the amicus curiae to assist the judges in deciding the issue. Both contended that the law could be interpreted to include all such women in the definition of “wife” to enable them to get maintenance.
Ahmed said that if a woman marries under personal laws, she immediately gets several rights and obligations. Those who do not, do not get any rights. “If such dependent women are provided for, this trend (of living-in) will also be discouraged,” he contended.
The bench agreed that the status of a wife need not be a pre-requisite for getting maintenance before reserving orders in the case. A prolonged domestic relationship resembling marriage is enough to entitle a deserted woman to maintenance, it observed.
Patwalia said that living-in was a fast-catching “urban phenomenon” which the law must address. “Here, the man has no obligations or responsibilities of any kind. Let the law reach out to them,” he said.
The bench also expressed anguish over the use of such words as “illegitimate” children and “other woman” in various laws and blamed the “patriarchal” mindset of law-makers for this. “The use of the word illegitimate stigmatises these children the day they are born,” Justice Singhvi said.
At another point, the court criticized law-makers for enshrining Rs 500 as the maximum maintenance per month in a 1973 law. “Whoever fixed the amount was miserly,” the judges observed. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, enshrines this as the maximum maintenance for all dependents — wife and children.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

(Video) "Are you going to finish strong?" [Inspirational and Powerful]

Watch this truly Motivating video.  We thing we have it tough, watch this video, and see how this man preservers and never gives up on life even when he falls on his face. Watch this and get others to watch and get motivated.
The average person who is fighting a IPC 498a or DV act 2005 Must watch this before going to court to get inner power to NEVER GIVE IN OR GIVE UP. Even if it takes a 100 times to succeed never quit. This is what this video will show you. Just watch the first 3 minutes if you do not want to see the entire clip. One must be tenacious.


Leave a comment



Nick Vujicic and his attitude serve as a great examples of the celebration of life over limitations.

The human spirit can handle much more than we realize.

"I LOVE LIVING LIFE. I AM HAPPY."

----------------------------------------­------------------------

Think you've got it bad?
Need some encouragement?
Fallen down?
Can't find the STRENGTH to get back up?

Watch this video. It will help. Then share it with others.

----------------------------------------­------------------------

"If I fail, I try again, and again, and again..."
If YOU fail, are YOU going to try again?

It matters how you're going to FINISH...
Are you going to finish STRONG?

We are put in situations to build our character... not destroy us.

The tensions in our life are there to strengthen our convictions... not to run over us.

----------------------------------------­------------------------

Nick is thankful for what he HAS.
He's not bitter for what he does NOT have.

I have never met a bitter person who was thankful.
I have never met a thankful person who was bitter.

In life you have a choice: Bitter or BETTER?

How to Avoid Divorce and Save Your Marriage

Nobody wants to have a marriage that ends in the lawyer's office. Often, the divorce is unexpected, but there are some elements whose compliance can lead to the avoidance of a possible break If you have already divorced, don't lose your hope. You can apply these 10 rules for the next relationship.

1. Do the final step after a longer time

Researchers say that those couples who get married after a longer relationship present fewer possibilities to divorce. Also, couples who are rushing to get to the altar, and those who are afraid to do it, tend to divorce faster than couples who get married when both partners are convinced that is the time to do this step.

2. Avoid living with the partner before marriage

In the last time, couples don't hesitate to live together before marriage. But researchers don't recommend it. It seems that those who live together before marriage tend to divorce more quickly than those who are separated until the moment of marriage.

3. Don't get married at a very early age

Statistics show that people who marry after age 25 tend to present less the risk of divorce.

4. Talk about the big issues that marriage involves

How consistent will be the family's budget? How many children do you want? Where are you going to live? It's very important to clarify these things before marriage. You can even ask for an expert's advice. Researches show that those who communicate more, understand each other better and solve their problems from the first stages, without leaving them to get worse.

5. Fights are normal as long as they are not exaggerated

Fights represent a normal part of a relationship. It matters the way in which you fight. Things that must be avoided: the criticism, offences, the defiance, the attack. It's important to reach an agreement in the end, although, most times, each partner claims that he is right.

6. Do different activities together

Each person has certain passions, which often don't match to the partner's preferences. This way, he goes to tennis every Saturday, while she goes swimming. Try to participate together to certain activities. 
Surely you will find interesting things to do, that will satisfy you both.

7. Share the household tasks

When one of the partners does all the work in the house, and the other does nothing about, there will appear easily fights, discontent and the possibility of a divorce.

8. Try to be as polite to each other as you are to strangers

Most times we tend to be the less polite to the closest people. Try to be more careful to your partner and remember to say him sometimes: "thanks", 'please', than having a loud tone when you ask him for something.

9. Are there any problems? Ask for help!

One of you suffers from depression? Have you been cheated? Don't hesitate to talk about it. Once the problems are left to get worse by themselves, this will lead to conflicts and major misunderstanding.

10. Get married to someone who really wants that

It may seem strange, but there are people who don't want a marriage. It's possible to have a special relationship with a person, but when you bring into discussion the possibility of a marriage, the person will avoid talking about. So, rather than have a major disappointment, try to find a person who wants the same as you!